tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post115443739046115110..comments2023-10-12T11:32:27.836-04:00Comments on paulconley: That's ridiculous, according to published reportsUnknownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07278569290198583553noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post-1154627948632877302006-08-03T13:59:00.000-04:002006-08-03T13:59:00.000-04:00It's one thing to summarize a printed story for yo...It's one thing to summarize a printed story for your readers and another altogether to rewrite that story with loose attributions to "published reports" and present it as your own. That's called plagarism in any media.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post-1154448700629128682006-08-01T12:11:00.000-04:002006-08-01T12:11:00.000-04:00It also seems unfair, in a way. If you are going t...It also seems unfair, in a way. If you are going to summarize others’ original reporting, where other news outlets have put their resources into getting the story, the least you can do is attribute properly.<BR/><BR/>Even better: link to the site and if your readers are interested, they can click to it, and presumably the original source gets their share of ad revenue.Matt Mullenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06340479944455290994noreply@blogger.com