tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post115133193383800751..comments2023-10-12T11:32:27.836-04:00Comments on paulconley: More bad news about B2B newsUnknownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07278569290198583553noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post-1152566148591650842006-07-10T17:15:00.000-04:002006-07-10T17:15:00.000-04:00Anonymous,I wouldn't say that "no one batted an ey...Anonymous,<BR/>I wouldn't say that "no one batted an eye." Although the article in question didn't -- at least in my mind -- push hard enough on the integrity issue, at least one source, Teri Mollison from Penton Media, is quoted suggesting that Schofield's model is flawed.<BR/>(Note: the article in question can be found here: http://www.foliomag.com/viewMedia.asp?prmMID=5520<BR/>There was also aUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07278569290198583553noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9554091.post-1152562455456969682006-07-10T16:14:00.000-04:002006-07-10T16:14:00.000-04:00Why should it be surprising that PR firms are able...Why should it be surprising that PR firms are able to buy content? Recently Folio did a front page feature on a magazine company built on the concept of 100% complimentary content, and no one batted an eye. (I doubt the writer of the article even bothered to read one of the magazines in question.) When the leading (and only) magazine for magazines thinks it's OK to sell content, why shouldn't Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com